Facebook has been experiencing difficulties. Not long ago, creator and CEO Mark Zuckerberg described his expansive vision for the metaverse and pledged $10 billion from the firm to make it a reality. But since then, things haven’t exactly gone smoothly.

It seems out that just though you alter the name of your business to Meta, people still won’t forget the negative things they originally knew about you. The business was already struggling with a number of problems, including the debate over how it manages user data and Apple’s updates to iOS that require developers to ask for permission before their apps may monitor users.

“If I had to bet, I’d say that this might be one of the worst downturns that we’ve seen in recent history,” Zuckerberg told staff on June 30 during the traditional weekly Q&A session. Zuckerberg said that the firm would reduce hiring. Zuckerberg informed staff members who might not be interested that “Self-selection among some of you may decide that this place is not for you, and I am fine with that. In all likelihood, there are many employees in the company who shouldn’t be there.”

Privacy is the major concern

Zuckerberg also spoke about the strategy regarding the future of Meta which includes monetizing Reels, Meta’s approach to the popularity of the well-known short-video app TikTok, and addressing the difficulties brought on by recent privacy improvements due to the significant risks they bring to revenue. The DMA focuses on the absence of competition in the digital market, whereas the DSA is more concerned with consumer protection and transparency.

In addition to the laws, Apple (AAPL) – Get Apple Inc. The report provided consumers more discretion over their privacy controls when they downloaded apps last year, which hurts Meta. The new feature, called App Tracking Transparency, requires users’ consent before any third-party apps can track their online activities for ad targeting.

How true is the perspective of Zuckerberg on the company’s employees?

Fair enough, Zuckerberg is most likely correct about the last part. Many of the employees at Meta definitely belong somewhere else and would be a better fit there. They can be clinging on because they can’t find another employment or because they aren’t excited about what the organisation is doing. That holds true in almost every business.

The truth is that it’s a bad approach to lead to believe that some of the employees of your firm don’t belong. Additionally, it’s a terrible strategy for inspiring your employees. Rather, you should always think favourably about your team. It is a sign of poor leadership if you start to believe there are employees at your organisation who shouldn’t be there.

I know Zuckerberg is under a lot of pressure. He has practically staked the entire business on his metaverse strategy. If it fails, the corporation will no longer be able to simply collect more customer data to use in order to display more individualised advertisements. Earlier this year, Facebook users decreased for the first time in ten years. There is just no other place for growth.

Giving your team the bombshell that they must work harder with fewer resources because your cash cow ceased producing milk is hardly the epitome of leadership. Additionally, it seems to overlook the most crucial element. Make things simpler for your staff, not more difficult for them. While you should still encourage them to work harder, it is your responsibility to give them the tools they need to succeed. They are not to blame if you are unable to achieve it. It falls on you